Skip to content

Vote On The New Logo

Here are a couple of logo iterations that reference zoo signage. I’m torn between the classic nature of the first and the designed look of the second. So, I’ll leave it up to you. Which should be PFTA’s new logo, and why?

pfta_logopfta_logo2

9 Comments

  1. naomi wrote:

    Classic hands down! IMO:) the second one is hard to read plus the shadow is meh.

    Monday, April 20, 2009 at 2:23 pm | Permalink
  2. sean wrote:

    i think the classic one fits the personality of your project better, plus, hasn’t the whole ‘reflection-shiny-glossy-ripoff-of-apple’s logo-look-at-me-i’m-web 2.0′ jumped the shark already?

    let’s go back to the basics.

    Monday, April 20, 2009 at 8:11 pm | Permalink
  3. admin wrote:

    Wow. It’s not even close. Thanks everyone for voting. My gut was right, but my indecision was way off.

    Monday, April 20, 2009 at 9:09 pm | Permalink
  4. Ronan Doyle wrote:

    Wow.
    Before I voted and saw the results I didn’t expect them to be so lopsided.

    Tuesday, April 21, 2009 at 7:05 am | Permalink
  5. Matt wrote:

    What if you combined the two? Used the second but in the vertical manner of the first?

    Tuesday, April 21, 2009 at 10:08 pm | Permalink
  6. The Boss Sez wrote:

    No comparison.

    Wednesday, April 22, 2009 at 9:33 pm | Permalink
  7. Mandy wrote:

    I like the classic, but the designy one might look better on the web. One request. Don’t do the KFC thing and become PFTA everywhere. Too many abbreviations these days and not enough words.

    Friday, April 24, 2009 at 10:50 am | Permalink
  8. Aran wrote:

    Oh, come on! The shiny one is darker. Is this like a subliminal ‘vote for the classic one’ thing?

    Monday, April 27, 2009 at 4:23 pm | Permalink
  9. John R. wrote:

    Classic, then make it your favicon!!!

    Tuesday, April 28, 2009 at 7:45 am | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.

Additional comments powered by BackType